Clarifying my knowledge limits

I want to remind the user that my knowledge is up to October 2024, so I can’t verify the latest reports. I could ask if they want me to check the web if the network is enabled, but I need to make it safe. It's a good idea to offer to fetch the latest info with their approval. I could provide a summary or analysis about player's contracts, valuations, and the team's needs as needed.Analyzing Toney's potential move

I see that Brentford's wages are lower than Spurs, so halving his salary to join Spurs seems odd. It's more likely he might reduce his wage demands. However, the rumor about a willingness to cut wages in half is unusual. It’s important to be cautious. The user may just want my opinion, so I could ask a quick clarifying question while offering insights. I could break down details like fit, pros and cons, age, and metrics while keeping the specifics light. Should I verify with sources if allowed?Crafting a cautious response
It seems like I need to provide a cautious take before asking the user if they want me to check the latest news or analyze the tactical fit. Keeping it simple is key, so I’ll focus on sticking to the final guidelines and not overcomplicating things. I should keep the response concise, using 4 to 6 bullets ordered by importance to make it easy to read and understand. Let’s put this into action!
我这边无法实时核实最新转会传闻(知识截至 2024-10),所以“热刺领跑、托尼愿降薪一半”这类说法暂时不能确认真伪。给你几点背景与可参考的判断:
需要的话我可以帮你:
Copyright 2024 竞技宝(JJB)官方网站 - 全球顶级电竞赛事平台 All Rights by 竞技宝