Analyzing Champions League qualifications

I’m exploring whether "阿贾克斯欧冠三连胜" could relate to "资格赛三连胜" in the Champions League qualifying rounds. Teams need to win multiple matches, and three consecutive wins could mean winning both legs of one round and the first leg of the next. However, even with three wins in a row, it’s possible to be knocked out if you lose the second leg by a large margin. It's quite nuanced!Examining Champions League progression

If a team wins both legs of QR2, they'd advance. But if they win the first leg of QR3 and then lose the second leg by a significant margin, their streak ends. The question “那为什么不能晋级呢？” raises an interesting point. While 9 points from three wins usually suffices to advance, it’s not guaranteed due to potential three-way ties. Historically, there have been instances where even 10 points didn’t guarantee progression. For example, in older formats, 9 points might not always be enough if all teams beat each other.Exploring qualifying scenarios

I’m considering historical examples about points in the Champions League. In 1997-98, Newcastle United had 7 points while Barcelona had 5, but it’s from a different context. Fast forward to 2012-13, where Manchester City finished with 3 points in their group. A notable case is Napoli in 2013-14, which had 12 points, yet they were eliminated due to a three-way tie with Dortmund and Arsenal based on head-to-head goal difference. This shows that even 9 points could potentially be insufficient as well.Interpreting the meme context

The question includes "格鲁克," which might refer to a Chinese internet meme connected to "足球小将" or a comedic scene discussing Ajax's potential three consecutive Champions League wins. It seems like it may relate to a Bilibili video, touching on how finishing third in the Champions League leads to dropping into the Europa League playoff. The rhetorical question "三连胜为什么不能晋级？" is interesting because, in knockout stages, you can't have three wins in a row due to only playing two legs, but across different rounds, you might achieve that.